GH
Guardant Health, Inc. (GH)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 2025 was a beat-and-raise quarter: revenue grew 31% year over year to $232.1M on broad strength across Oncology (+22%), Screening ($14.8M) and Biopharma & Data (+28%); non-GAAP gross margin expanded to 66% from 60% YoY .
- Consensus comparison: revenue significantly beat S&P Global consensus ($232.1M vs $211.3M); non-GAAP EPS beat (-$0.44 vs -$0.515). EBITDA definition differences mean Street EBITDA was weaker than expected even as adjusted EBITDA improved; see Estimates Context for details .
- Guidance raised: FY25 revenue to $915–$925M (from $880–$890M), Oncology growth to ~20% (from ~18%), Screening to $55–$60M (from $40–$45M), and non-GAAP gross margin to 63–64% (from 62–63%); non-GAAP OpEx nudged higher to support accelerated screening build-out .
- Key catalysts: Shield CRC gained NCCN guideline inclusion, Shield ASP uplift from ADLT status, Shield MCD earned FDA Breakthrough designation and began NCI Vanguard enrollment, and “Smart Liquid Biopsy” apps expanded G360 Liquid utility—collectively supporting growth and narrative momentum .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Broad-based growth and margin expansion: Total revenue +31% YoY to $232.1M; non-GAAP gross margin rose to 66% (from 60%); adjusted EBITDA loss improved by ~$10M YoY .
- Shield CRC scaling faster than plan: $14.8M revenue on ~16,000 tests; ASP >$900 and non-GAAP gross margin reached 48% (vs 18% in Q1, 2% in Q4’24) driven by ADLT pricing and cost controls .
- Product innovation and strategic wins: 11 new Smart Liquid Biopsy apps for G360 Liquid; Tissue ASP ~$2,000 three years ahead of target; Reveal data publications and MolDx submission for breast; FDA Breakthrough for Shield MCD and NCI Vanguard start .
Management quotes:
- “Q2 was another exceptional quarter… we introduced 11 groundbreaking Smart Liquid Biopsy applications… significantly expanding the clinical utility” — Helmy Eltoukhy .
- “Shield continued to generate strong demand… volume, revenue and gross profit grew strongly, ahead of our expectations” — AmirAli Talasaz .
What Went Wrong
- Continued losses and higher OpEx: GAAP net loss -$99.9M; non-GAAP OpEx rose to $215.3M (+20% YoY) and full-year non-GAAP OpEx guidance increased to $840–$850M to fund screening commercialization .
- EBITDA/Street metric mismatch: While adjusted EBITDA improved (-$51.9M vs -$61.9M YoY), Street “EBITDA” (S&P-defined) was weaker than consensus (see Estimates Context) .
- Shield V2 timing uncertainty: Management suggested V2 data/launch may slip beyond year-end; ASP expected to trend to ~$800 in H2 given payer mix shift, tempering near-term upside .
Financial Results
Segment revenue breakdown:
KPIs and operating metrics:
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- Strategic positioning: “Product innovation built on Smart Liquid Biopsy is integral to our strategy… to further extend our technical leadership in the comprehensive genomic profiling market.” — Helmy Eltoukhy .
- Shield growth engine: “Given our performance this quarter… we are further accelerating the build out of our commercial infrastructure and now expect to surpass 250 sales reps by year end.” — AmirAli Talasaz .
- Profitability roadmap: “Excluding screening, we continue to expect the remainder of the business to reach free cash flow breakeven in the fourth quarter of 2025.” — Michael Bell .
- ASP drivers: “Shield ASP was over $900 in Q2… Medicare rate increased from $920 to $1,495 following ADLT status… and strong Medicare Advantage reimbursement.” — Michael Bell .
Q&A Highlights
- Shield ASP outlook/mix: ASP >$900 in Q2; modeling ~$800 for H2 as mix shifts toward commercial; Medicare Advantage collections strong .
- Shield V2 timing: Management not rushed; V2 remains active but may slip beyond year-end; prioritizing MCD readiness and commercial momentum .
- Serena-6 impact: Minimal in Q2; potential future driver if drug approved, with G360 monitoring paradigm expanding use cases .
- Medicaid risk: Very minimal exposure; not a volume/revenue driver .
- Sales force scale: Targeting >250 Shield reps by YE; long-term plan still ~700; reinvesting screening gross profit into S&M .
- Tissue advantages: RNA/methylome features; 40% less slides; potential for FDA+ADLT in future; share gains expected .
Estimates Context
Q2 2025 actuals vs S&P Global consensus:
- Revenue and EPS: Both beats; non-GAAP EPS (-$0.44) exceeded Street’s -$0.515 estimate, while revenue beat by ~10% vs consensus.
- EBITDA: Street “EBITDA” shows a miss relative to consensus; note Guardant reports adjusted EBITDA (-$51.9M), which differs by definition from S&P’s EBITDA metric .
- Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Implications:
- Expect upward estimate revisions for FY25 revenue, Oncology and Screening lines, and non-GAAP gross margin trajectory following stronger-than-expected ASPs and volumes.
- Some dispersion may persist around EBITDA given definitional differences; analysts may lean on adjusted EBITDA for comparability.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Narrative strength: Multiple tangible catalysts (NCCN inclusion, ADLT pricing, Breakthrough designation, Vanguard start, SLB app launches) support continued top-line acceleration and margin expansion .
- Beat-and-raise setup: Q2 beat vs consensus and guidance raise across revenue, Oncology, Screening, and margins point to estimate momentum and potential multiple support .
- Screening economics inflecting: Shield non-GAAP gross margin moved to 48% with ASP uplift; reinvestment strategy should scale volumes while keeping company-wide burn on the 2028 breakeven path .
- Oncology core resilient: G360 Liquid growth accelerating for the fourth consecutive quarter; Tissue ASP step-up and Reveal expansion into breast/IO reinforce multi-product engine .
- Watch H2 mix dynamics: Shield ASP modeled ~$800 due to payer mix shift; volumes expected back-half loaded as new reps ramp .
- Regulatory trajectory: Continued guideline inclusion (ACS, USPSTF) would be significant catalysts for Shield adoption and commercial payer contracting; monitor timing and panel developments .
- Trade setup: Near-term upside favored by estimate revisions and September Investor Day visibility; risk balancing includes continued losses, higher OpEx to fund screening scale, and timing uncertainty on Shield V2 .